Monday, January 20, 2020
P:overty :: essays research papers
 Mark Sandfordà  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Marsh 1    English 200    Mr.Whisnant    Summary    February 08, 2004        à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Summary of the Singer Solution to World Poverty        à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Both stories proclaim that you should not spend your money on material or     unnecessary things or wants, but to give them to children in foreign countries that we do     not even know. The fact that Dora did not make enough money and that she could only     make ends meet was a key factor to her agreeing to pick up a child and drop it off at a     so-called wealthy foreignerââ¬â¢s house. In return she is given 1,000 dollars to spend at her     leisure, only to be told that night that she gave the child to a childrenââ¬â¢s organ peddler.    à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  If Dora in fact did not at least try to get the child back or locate it, then in every     moral situation she would be wrong. To say that her new T.V. is more important or worth     more than the child would be correct. But the fact that we are so easily interested in     making more money, we seem to let our morals just slip away.    à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  In Bobââ¬â¢s case he has a chance to save a kids life and chooses not to in fear of     losing his classic vintage car, along with the savings which he has not been able to insure.     So in reality he would lose everything he owns, in which case he does not want to lose.     This seems harsh, but the fact is that children die every day because they do not have     enough money to feed and clothe themselves. Is it really up to us to support these total   à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Marsh 2  strangers that we have never, and will never meet even if we did send them money or     food.    à  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Both of these people did something morally wrong, but Bob unlike Dora had a     chance to save a life that he could have easily avoided by smashing his old car. Bob is like     the people who have enough money, but are not willing to send to overseas children. Dora     on the other hand let greed overcome her and put the child in the situation which led to     the killing of the child. A lot of people would still think that Bob is worse between the two     considering he chose his car over a little childââ¬â¢s life. In fact you also have to agree that if     you do not send some of your money to overseas organizations then you are like Bob.  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.